After his education in Singapore since 1998 (secondary 3), and after once been a teacher in training under the Ministry of Education in Singapore, I think one of the many shortcomings of the education system of Singapore is that it is a good career / missing guidance for education students.
Well, I suppose you could argue that the education itself, what is missing, but an oversight (or indifference) of the Ministry of Education in the thought that people know what you want, and will be happy with the choices they made on the age of 16. But believe me when I compare the education of the Ministry of Education.For those not familiar with the education system in Singapore.
At the age of 16 or 17 years, after taking the GCE O-level, the student must choose whether he / she wants to go to the Polytechnic, where he / she has a degree in a specialized area (eg, Engineering, Business, Accounting , mass communication, Nursing, Biomedical Sciences, Information Technology, etc.) or to study in the first study for the GCE levels or International Baccalaureate diploma. The GCE A Levels and the IB diploma program are essentially similar - students choose a number of topics, from a group of subjects available, such as Mathematics, Physics, Biology, Chemistry, History, literature, geography, economics, etc. In other words, words Everything is quite common, and students are not limited to any particular field.
What worries me is when most students opt for the route Polytechnic. In fact, I'm all for the idea of an HBO school, because I personally feel that the other route is a waste of time (after the experienced). But this applies only if the student knows, at the age of 16 or 17, what he or she is interested and wants his / her career to build.Which brings me to my point that the lack of career / education guidance or counseling in our educational system. Students go to the colleges, the choice of courses that have very little idea, and just discovered they hate the course. While some may leave and re-application of the course to another course more, ultimately perpetuating that mistake, and pursue careers in fields that do not want.
Therefore it is necessary that students have a clear idea of what they ask, what options they have and the different types of careers that would need to follow a certain course given.
Students often choose courses based on the following factors:
1. Not knowing what they want
2. Options for friends3. Selection of parents4. Ministry options (such as the Ministry of Education actively promote the life sciences, everyone rushed to the course. Ditto Info-Tech courses)5. Not having an option due to lower-than-stellar results on the O
And sometimes hate students to complete their studies because:
1. They knew that the course would look like2. They were not aware of the career choices (most of that study life sciences I never thought that I would end up in the lab every day watching cells grow or something)
3. They received only a general description of what the course is about, but not in depth information from the various modules (materials should be given to the students to read, instead of just an overview of the brochures faculty)In that case it painfully clear that the students career / education guidance is lacking, especially after O-level is very general, very general and A-Levels (these roads are the name of the General Certificate of Education GCE for a reason too), because after these tests is to choose the specialties of colleges and universities, which affect their future career.
Of course, a certain discipline to the work force is not entirely impossible, but not the point of education to be equipped with the skills and knowledge to efficiently implement and efficiency of a work in the future? Would not it be a waste of resources to train an engineer, but that he / she goes to another job completely separate?
The remedy for this, maybe it reduce or minimize errors in the decision making stage, and I feel it can be done through the right career / educational guidance.ETA: As I write this, it is also clear to me that it might be better for career guidance are provided by a party that is neutral, not directly related to or influenced by the Ministry of Education. But I am good in both directions (outside of the Ministry of Education, preferably the first), provided that is not provided by the school that the student is considering, for obvious reasons not exactly going to be impartial .
No comments:
Post a Comment